Angie has not always been an exemplary good-girl, which she looks like against the background of her divorce from Pitt. In the piggy bank of the main Hollywood beauty, there is a very stormy youth and a very ambiguous past - the actress herself never tries to talk about these secrets. Stormy youth
The young beauty started her first serious relationship at the age of 14. Her mother, Marcheline Bertrand, allowed Angie's chosen one to live in their house and for two whole years looked favorably on this civil marriage. I must say that such a liberal upbringing had an extremely positive effect on the future star: at 16, Angelina "played enough" in relationships and happily focused on work. Fatal lady
The institution of marriage has never been a problem for Angie. It was recently revealed that it was she who caused the high-profile divorce of Uma Thurman and Ethan Hawke: Jolie seduced Eaton on the set of Taking Lives. However, Hawke does not consider himself guilty of treason - in one of the interviews the actor said that not a single person in the world would have resisted the onslaught of Angelina. Plastic surgery
The actress did her first operation in her youth. Many believe that Angelina corrected her lips, but in fact, the actress only worked on her nose and cheekbones. Her lips are definitely her own - so, at least, says the biographer of the actress, Jenny Paul. So so mom
In 2012, the publication in the Hollywood Star caused a real scandal. The reporter collected material according to which Angelina turned out to be almost the worst mom in Hollywood. She really did not bring up the children well, allowing them a lot. In addition, the problem was in proper nutrition: Angie saw nothing wrong with breakfast with fatty hamburgers and allowed the children too much sweets. Polyamory
Angie, too, cannot be called a faithful wife. In an interview with the German Das Neue Magazine, the actress stated that she was not at all going to remain someone's property simply because of the marriage bond. However, Angelina herself does not see a special problem in intrigues on the side - they say, why limit the freedom of another person.